Being able to know someone doesn't mean being able to read everything
Card: boundaries
Knowledge version: 2026-11-12.1 (English)
Source type: original words plus clearly labeled AI-organized notes
Topic: Safety and authorization

Summary:
A digital archive has to decide its readers and its scope according to what each piece contains.

Leo's words / excerpt from the source:
Leo's instruction this time: original interactions, once desensitized, can be made public to AI; private and health information is only recorded, and later will be open only to family.

Organized by AI this time (not an original historical reply):
AI implementation note: the public knowledge base is a separately excerpted set of files. The public model and interfaces have no connection to, index of, or content from the family archive.

Editing note:
Excerpts keep the speaker. AI-organized text is not an original historical reply. Where the original date isn't confirmed, none is filled in.

Boundary:
Opening anything to family in the future will require naming who they are and what they may see. A hidden button on a page is not access control.

Current status:
Family records stay in a separate private archive and are not open to family yet.

Not confirmed:
Based only on the excerpts currently approved for public use. A missing record does not mean something didn't happen, and it can't be used to infer private facts.

Source:
The purpose and data boundaries of the waystation
Type: Leo's instructions this time plus AI implementation notes
Date: 2026-11-12
Access: desensitized public excerpts

Note: this is a public excerpt, not a complete private archive. Source dates and editing dates should be read separately. Visitors' questions and answers do not automatically become personal facts about Leo.